

Ehrlich, Carl Sagan, Donald Kennedy, Walter Orr Roberts, The Cold and the Dark: The World after Nuclear War (New York: W. True enough, but beside the point the point is that being fifteen in no way proves a person a noncombatant. 6 One might object that this is in itself morally wrong. 5 Gerald Dworkin, “ Nuclear Intentions ,” Ethics 95, No. (He later claims that he is “prepared for purposes of argument to assume” these extensions, but does not abandon them in the remainder of the article.) 4 Ibid. 2 Richard Wasserstrom, “ War, Nuclear War, and Nuclear Deterrence: Some Conceptual and Moral Issues ,” Ethics, 95, No. Tuchman, A Distant Mirror New York: Alfred A. Kavka, “ Some Paradoxes of Deterrence ,” The Journalįootnotes 1 Cf.

9 The literature is extensive some representative articles: Anthony Kenny, “Counterforce and Countervalue,” in Nuclear Weapons and Christian Conscience (London: The Merlin Press, 1961) Gregory S. Orwell understood it as a nuclear stalemate between super-states. This hostility between the two superpowers was first given its name by George Orwell in an article published in 1945. 6 One might object that this is in itself morally wrong. The Cold War was an ongoing political rivalry between the United States and the Soviet Union and their respective allies that developed after World War II. THE END OF INNOCENTS: AN ARRAY OF ARGUMENTS FOR THE MORAL PERMISSIBILITY OF A RETALIATORY NUCLEAR STRIKE THE END OF INNOCENTS: AN ARRAY OF ARGUMENTS FOR THE MORAL PERMISSIBILITY OF A RETALIATORY NUCLEAR.įootnotes 1 Cf.
